Economic Development Futures Journal

Sunday, November 27, 2005

counter statistics

Eminent Domain Update

Many places are not happy with the five-month old decision by the Supreme Court allowing a Connecticut city to seize private property for a private development. Since then several states have lined up to ban or restrict the practice and dozens of others are expected to follow suit early next year.

Ohio Gov. Bob Taft last week signed into law a 14-month moratorium on the use of eminent domain when the primary goal is economic development. Legislatures in Alabama and Texas have also banned the practice, and Michigan is considering a constitutional prohibition against seizing private property for private economic development.

A measure was introduced this year in the Illinois General Assembly to prohibit eminent domain for economic development, unless approved by the Legislature. But the bill failed to pass before the Legislature adjourned.

I understand people's concern about this Supreme Court decision. From my assessment, most local governments are not prepared to handle this new authority correctly. This is a desparate time in many communities across America. Our economy is not in good shape, despite what the White House has to say, and state and local government finances have not been such a mess in a long time. There is reason to question how they might use the authority at this time.

What we might consider instead is starting an open dialogue about how to better balance public and private interests when it comes to development. That is a meaningful thing for national professional associations representing the economic development, community development, planning, and public administration practitioners might consider.

Read more here.

4 Comments:

  • "From my assessment, most local governments are not prepared to handle this new authority correctly."

    Don,

    What new authority? The Supreme Court didn't grant local governments any new authority. It just chose not to restrict the authority that local governments already claim and that many abuse.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10:11 AM  

  • Chip,

    Thanks for your comment. Yes, you are correct. The SC decision upheld current authority. It also encourages local governments to use that authority more extensively and aggressively. I find that troubling because I see a desparation within local government right now that could lead to inappropriate use of their ED authority.

    Don

    By Blogger Don Iannone, D.Div., Ph.D., at 11:18 AM  

  • I found in my experience that eminent domainis basicaly used to getrid "blight" by mving povertypockets out...getting rid of thepoor, protecting "our" propertyrights.. sad, but true. Their is always greed and power behind theuse of eminent domain..I know first hand..I was one on a Planing and Zoning Commision and worked withRedevelopment...I am ashamed ofthat experience. It is far better to build good youth programs, and community centers..Believe me!
    The Storyteller

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 1:18 PM  

  • Ed,

    Thanks for your post. I agree. Continue working with kids and building community centers.

    Don

    By Blogger Don Iannone, D.Div., Ph.D., at 3:41 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home